VOICES: The Railroading of Troy Davis
freedomarchives.org (on behalf of
Political Prisoner News)
May 05, 2011
Laura Moye is director of the Amnesty International USA Death
Penalty Abolition Campaign. In this interview, Moye talks about
42-year-old Troy Davis, an African American who has been on death row in
Georgia for over 19 years -- having already faced three execution dates.
The continued railroading of Davis has sparked outrage around the world,
and public pressure during the last few years of Davis' appeals has been
essential to his survival today.
However, on March 28, 2011, the US Supreme Court rejected his appeal
against a federal district court's ruling that Davis did not prove his
innocence in an evidentiary hearing held last year. This week Amnesty
International released an email action alert, emphasizing that now, more
than a month after the Supreme Court ruling, Davis' execution date can
literally be scheduled any day. The situation is dire, and public
support is currently needed now more than ever before.
To take action and learn more, visit Amnesty International's page
focusing on Troy Davis, as well as the Color of Change petition,
www.justicefortroy.org and
www.troyanthonydavis.org .
Angola 3 News:
Why does Amnesty International consider
Troy Davis' case to be so important?
Laura Moye:
Troy Davis' case is emblematic of a broken and unjust death penalty
system. His story speaks volumes about a criminal justice system that is
riddled with bias and error and is fixated on procedure more than it is
on fairness.
It is often difficult to get people to understand or to be interested in
systematic and large-scale injustice, but Troy Davis' story has gotten
through to a lot of people and has made the abolition cause more
tangible and real for a lot of people.
A3N:
What do you think are the most
compelling facts about this case?
LM: The case
against Davis has unraveled, yet he still faces execution. The
conviction rests primarily on nine key witnesses, but six have recanted
and one contradicted her trial statement. The police recovered shell
casings at the crime scene, which were naturally present given that
there was a shooting. However, they never found a murder weapon or any
other physical evidence linking the shell casings to Troy Davis.
Almost all of the witnesses were vulnerable for one reason or another.
One witness was illiterate, others were minors that were questioned
without their parents or supportive adults, some had criminal histories,
and most were African American.
The murder of the white police officer enraged local law enforcement,
and indeed it was a terrible crime. Officer Mark MacPhail was rushing to
the aid of a homeless man who was beaten unconscious in a Burger King
parking lot on the other side of a Greyhound bus station in a poor end
of town. When he came running to the scene, he was shot, and he fell to
the ground without even having drawn his weapon. He left behind a wife
and two very small children. Outrage was appropriate in the wake of his
death. However, reports about how the investigation was conducted call
into question how fair and proper things went. Many speak to the intense
pressure on the African American community to find the perpetrator. Most
of the witnesses allege coercion by the police in obtaining statements.
Strangely, one of the two witnesses who did not recant his testimony has
been implicated in at least nine affidavits and by a new eyewitness
account as being the actual perpetrator. This very same man was the one
who first reported to the police that Davis was the shooter. He was
never treated as a suspect himself. He was not put in line-ups and he
was present at the crime scene with other witnesses for a reenactment of
the events.
Davis had a heck of a time trying to seek relief once his case moved
from the trial level to the post-conviction habeas process. The Georgia
Resource Center was hit with a two-thirds budget cut, which reduced the
number of staff attorneys to two, representing about eighty prisoners.
Triage was not even possible with the remaining resources. Yet this was
the time for Davis to assemble evidence and an argument about his
innocence claim.
Also, in the mid-1990s, the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty
Act (AEDPA), was passed on the heels of the Oklahoma City Bombing. It
limited access by death row prisoners [to] the federal appeals process,
placing time limits on introduction of new evidence, for example. Davis'
case was negatively impacted along with others.
Troy Davis has been confronted with a system that would rather hold onto
a decision a jury made twenty years ago than admit that some
fundamentally wrong things have happened. It is a system bent on
preserving itself more than on being absolutely sure that injustice and
inaccuracy are filtered out.
A3N:
Please tell us more about the racism in
Davis' case.
LM: Davis is
African American. MacPhail, the murder victim, was White. The
perpetrator was indisputably African American. The crime happened on a
poor end of town, near housing projects and behind a Greyhound bus
station. The racial dynamics in the community were inflamed by the
murder and the ensuing investigation. Many African Americans have talked
about the fear they felt in the midst of a very intense manhunt.
A3N:
Do you think the injustices in his case
are symptomatic of the overall criminal justice system in the US?
LM: Many death
penalty cases have issues of unfairness. Davis' is less common in that
there is a serious innocence claim.
However, how people are treated by the criminal justice system because
of their background, particularly race and class, is illustrated by this
case. The lack of resources for people's defense and appeals work is
very common. And the difficulty in accessing the appeals process for
meaningful relief is also very difficult.
A3N:
Why have the appeals courts been so
opposed to granting a new trial?
LM: The county
superior court in Savannah, Georgia would not grant Davis'
"extraordinary motion for a new trial." He appealed this all the way up
to the U.S. Supreme Court and was denied. Interestingly, the Georgia
Supreme Court denied his appeal by one vote.
The courts are very hesitant to re-open death penalty cases. Witness
recantations are considered suspect and testimony by the many people who
implicate the other suspect are dismissed as "hearsay." And yet we know
that most of the 138 exonerees from death row did not have DNA at their
disposal, just like Davis, who had no other kind of physical evidence.
At trial, the state has the burden to prove the defendant is "guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt." After a conviction, that standard
disappears. The prisoner then has an uphill battle to prove that the
conviction was wrong or faulty.
A3N:
When do you expect that an execution
date will be set?
LM: As soon as
Georgia announces that it has a protocol for carrying out executions
again, we expect an execution warrant to be signed against Davis. From
that point, an execution date could be two weeks away.
A couple months ago, the DEA seized Georgia's supply of lethal injection
drugs after a complaint was filed about how they accessed their supply
of Sodium Thiopental. Davis would already have received a date if this
issue was not at play. So time is very much of the essence.
A3N:
What can our readers do to support Troy
Davis right now?
LM: We know
many people have signed the petition, but this is a hugely important
thing we need. If you have not signed the petition this year, please
sign it again -- by going to
www.justicefortroy.org and if you have signed it, please share it
with ten friends and ask them to do the same. You can print out the
petition and circulate it. That's downloadable from the website too.
If you know clergy or legal professionals, ask them to please sign the
sign-on letters for Troy. And when a date is set, join us for an
international day of solidarity, where we will have demos around the
world in advance of Davis' clemency hearing to show the parole board
that the world is watching and demands a stop to the execution!
http://www.southernstudies.org/2011/05/voices-the-railroading-of-troy-davis.html
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
|